Verified comparison

Uptime Kuma is an alternative
to Site24x7

$0/mo (Self-hosted (free)) vs Site24x7 at — — covering 25% of the 4 compared capabilities.

Same job. Way less money.

Comparison scenario

Every cheaper-than claim is tied to a defined scenario — never a bare list price.

Scenario

single user, monthly billing · USD · prices as observed on official pricing pages.

Site24x7 basis

plan at —, the cheapest paid plan.

Uptime Kuma basis

Self-hosted (free): 0 USD/monthly.

The short version

We list 1 assessed alternative; Site24x7's own price is not verified yet, so no cheaper-than claim is made.

Uptime Kuma covers 25% of the 4 capabilities compared against Site24x7. ✓ native · ◐ via integration · ✗ not found.

Capability	Uptime Kuma	Site24x7
Status pages	✓	✓
SMS & voice alerts	✗	✓
Slack/Teams/PagerDuty alerting	✗	✓
API access	✗	✓

Capabilities Site24x7 has that Uptime Kuma lacks.

SMS & voice alerts — Get downtime alerts by text message or phone call.
Missing from Uptime Kuma.
Slack/Teams/PagerDuty alerting — Send alerts to Slack, Teams, or PagerDuty.
Missing from Uptime Kuma.
API access — Manage monitors programmatically via an API.
Missing from Uptime Kuma.

Advertised prices in USD as observed on the official pricing pages — per-seat and transaction-fee plans are marked.

Uptime Kuma

Self-hosted (free)

Free

Site24x7

What does Uptime Kuma lack compared with Site24x7?

SMS & voice alerts, Slack/Teams/PagerDuty alerting, API access — 3 of the 4 compared capabilities.

When were these prices checked?

Site24x7: 2026-09-12; Uptime Kuma: 2026-09-07 — on the official pricing pages.